@abhishekrajaram's Latest X Threads

Read threads by Abhishek Raja "Ram" and get notified about future ones.

Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

97k

Followers

Never miss a thread from @abhishekrajaram

Get their latest threads delivered straight to your inbox.

๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ: "Though Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules 1994 was declared ultra vires, proceedings already initiated under it are saved by Section 174 of the CGST Act."

over 1 year ago

Read it

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ž๐—ผ๐—น๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ: "SBPDCL qualifies as a โ€˜Government Authorityโ€™ and the works performed by the appellant align with functions entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W of the Constitution of India, thereby exempting the appellant from service tax."

over 1 year ago

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—™๐˜‚๐—น๐—น ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ช๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: "The taxpayer is required to deposit the entire disputed demand within 15 days to avail a writ remedy due to the non-constitution of GSTAT."

over 1 year ago

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: "The petition challenging the GST Councilโ€™s classification decision is accepted for consideration, with a focus on the legal authority and rationale behind the tax rate."

over 1 year ago

๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐— ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐— ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐Ÿšจ

over 1 year ago

๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ, ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป* ๐ŸŽ‰

over 1 year ago

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ž๐—ผ๐—น๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข The Tribunal held: "SBPDCL, wholly owned by Bihar State Power (Holding) Company, qualifies as a 'Government Authority' under Notification 25/2012-ST, making the works contract services provided by the appellant exempt from service tax."

over 1 year ago

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐— ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ญ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข The Tribunal held: "Exemption from service tax for authorized operations in SEZs cannot be denied on technical grounds like filing delays. Refund entitlement depends on SEZ Act conditions, not additional terms in exemption notifications."

over 1 year ago

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—”๐—ต๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜† ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—™๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐Ÿ“ข The Tribunal held: "Service of the adjudication order to an authorised legal representative, such as a Chartered Accountant, is not equivalent to service upon the appellant. Therefore, the appeal is not time-barred."

over 1 year ago

๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—š๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ธ๐—ฎ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐Ÿ“ข The Court held: "Benefits under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme cannot be denied due to technical payment issues, as the scheme aims to aid defaulters in settling dues."

over 1 year ago

PreviousNext