Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ž๐—ผ๐—น๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฎ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—š๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ: "SBPDCL qualifies as a โ€˜Government Authorityโ€™ and the works performed by the appellant align with functions entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W of the Constitution of India, thereby exempting the appellant from service tax."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s Vrindavan Construction ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: The appellant contested a service tax demand for works provided to SBPDCL, arguing SBPDCL qualifies as a "Government Authority" under Notification 25/2012-ST, thus exempting it from service tax.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal held that SBPDCL, fully owned by the Bihar government, qualifies as a "Government Authority" under Notification No. 25/2012-ST. The appellantโ€™s work aligns with functions under Article 243W, thus exempt from service tax. Consequently, no tax, interest, or penalties were due, and the appeal was allowed.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s Vrindavan Construction vs. Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & Central Excise, Patna ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ. 75882 of 2022 ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 29 August 2023 ๐Ÿ“œThis ruling clarifies that SBPDCL qualifies as a government authority, and works entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W are exempt from service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own