Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š— š—®š—±š—暝—®š˜€ š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—暝˜ š—šš—暝—®š—»š˜š˜€ š—”š˜€š˜€š—²š˜€š˜€š—²š—² š—”š—»š—¼š˜š—µš—²š—æ š—–š—µš—®š—»š—°š—² š˜š—¼ š——š—²š—³š—²š—»š—± š—šš—¦š—§ š— š—¶š˜€š—ŗš—®š˜š—°š—µ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—”š—³š˜š—²š—æ š— š—¶š˜€š˜€š—²š—± š—›š—²š—®š—暝—¶š—»š—“ šŸšØ

In Umesh Electricals v. Commercial Tax Officer, the Madras High Court provided relief to the Assessee, who missed a personal hearing related to a GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B mismatch notice issued on the GST portal. šŸ“„

After an adverse order was passed due to non-appearance, the Assessee requested another opportunity to present their case, asserting no actual mismatch existed. šŸ“‰

āš–ļø Recognizing potential merit, the Court exercised discretion, quashing the previous order and remanding the case for a fresh hearing on the merits. This decision underscores procedural fairness in GST proceedings.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own