Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 2 months ago
ššš¦š§šš§ š ššŗšÆš®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š¦šš š„š²š³šš»š± šš¹š®š¶šŗš š¢ The Tribunal held: "Exemption from service tax for authorized operations in SEZs cannot be denied on technical grounds like filing delays. Refund entitlement depends on SEZ Act conditions, not additional terms in exemption notifications."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s. Tal Manufacturing Solutions Ltd., a SEZ unit manufacturing aircraft components. ššššš²: Whether the refund can be denied based on the one-year filing limitation or duplicate claims for the same quarter.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal emphasized that SEZ operations authorized under the SEZ Act are inherently exempt from service tax, regardless of notification conditions or time limits. Since tax cannot be levied or collected on authorized SEZ services, refunds should be granted after verifying documentation.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s. Tal Manufacturing Solutions Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼. 86575 of 2019 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 31 August 2023 š This ruling underscores that SEZ tax exemptions cannot be restricted by notification terms. Refunds must be processed if claims meet SEZ Act requirements.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own