Revolutionary Raja Ram for Tax & Economic Reforms

@abhishekrajaram

10 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—§š—›š—˜ š—”š—„š—§ š—¢š—™ š——š—„š—”š—™š—§š—œš—”š—š š—„š—˜š—£š—Ÿš—¬ š—§š—¢ š—”š—¢š—§š—œš—–š—˜š—¦ š—¢š—„/š—”š—”š—— š—”š—£š—£š—˜š—”š—Ÿš—¦..!! (š—£š—®š—暝˜-šŸ® š—¼š—³ šŸÆ) In Part 1, we started drafting reply or Appeal which I will continue here.

There is a basic difference in drafting in Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes. In Direct Taxes everything revolves around "undisclosed or unexplained transactions" whereas Indirect Taxes it is usually around reported ones.

In case the reply is against Scrutiny Notice then also there is vast difference in approach of both authorities. In Direct Taxes usually the additions are made when assessee is unable to produce records such as purchase vouchers for number of purchases etc

whereas in GST the issues relate to reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) whether due to mismatch of ITC as per GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B or ITC claim for Suppliers whose registration is cancelled retrospectively.

In GST person usually has all the relevant documents what is needed is to be proved that these are genuine transactions, there has been actual movement and receipt of goods and the tax has been deposited with the Revenue.

As you understand the replies needs different things to be proved therefore, the replies have to be drafted with different strategies.

š——š—œš—¦š—–š—Øš—¦š—¦š—œš—¢š—” š—¢š—™ š—˜š—©š—œš——š—˜š—”š—–š—˜ In last part we discussed "Points of Determination." As these cases are more or less civil suits the approach should be to co-relate the evidence with other documents or facts.

For Example, Goods Purchased could be proved with Weighing Slip, Gate Pass Register, Goods Receipt, E-Way Bill, Transport Lorry Slip etc. If this can be linked to actual sales transaction to third party or PSU it would be better.

š—˜š—©š—œš——š—˜š—”š—–š—˜ š˜ƒš˜€ š—š—Øš——š—œš—–š—œš—”š—Ÿ š—£š—„š—¢š—”š—¢š—Øš—”š—–š—˜š— š—˜š—”š—§š—¦ š˜›š˜³š˜¶š˜µš˜© š˜„š˜°š˜¦š˜“ š˜Æš˜°š˜µ š˜®š˜¢š˜µš˜µš˜¦š˜³, š˜š˜¢š˜¤š˜µš˜“ š˜„š˜°..!!! As any Criminal case the weightage of evidence is equally important in Civil case if not more.

Judicial case laws helps in advancement of the arguments but those cannot act as the base of the argument. Unless you master the facts, no case law could be of your help.

š—˜š—«š—£š—Ÿš—”š—”š—”š—§š—œš—¢š—”š—¦ All documents which you are reling and submitting to the Department should be self-explanatory and if not proper explanation of facts, documents, evidence, case laws etc should form part of your reply.

š—”š—™š—™š—œš——š—”š—©š—œš—§š—¦ Whenever you are short of any evidence or document and you are 100% sure about the fact then submit Affidavit. Affidavits helps in establishing the fact unless contrary proved.

š—–š—œš—„š—–š—Øš— š—¦š—§š—”š—”š—–š—˜š—¦ Like in any civil suit, circumstances plays an important role in establishing a fact in Tax matters too. Failure to disclose income or a particular source of income could be construed as an attempt to evade tax. Hope you will find this useful.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own