Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—§š—²š—¹š—®š—»š—“š—®š—»š—® š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—暝˜ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š——š—²š—±š˜‚š—°š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—¼š—³ š—˜š˜…š—½š—²š—»š—±š—¶š˜š˜‚š—暝—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ Justice P. Sam Koshy and Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty stated,

For an expenditure to qualify for deduction under Section 37, it must be incurred for the business carried on by the assessee and must be spent wholly and exclusively for its own business.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Pipelic Energy Software India Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Deducting expenses for overseeing the holding company's project. š—£š—暝—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: Expenses disallowed by AO, initially allowed by CIT(A), but reversed by Tribunal.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The High Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling: such expenses are not deductible under Section 37.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Pipelic Energy Software India Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—”š—¼: ITA No. 561 Of 2006

šŸ“œ This emphasizes distinguishing operational expenses from those for a holding company. #TelanganaHighCourt #IncomeTax #arr4nirc

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own