Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

7 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—¦š˜‚š—½š—暝—²š—ŗš—² š—–š—¼š˜‚š—暝˜ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—–š—¼š—暝—½š—¼š—暝—®š˜š—² š—šš˜‚š—®š—暝—®š—»š˜š—²š—²š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—–š—¼š˜‚š—暝˜ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Service tax cannot be levied on corporate guarantees in the absence of consideration, as the activity does not meet the criteria for taxability under the Finance Act, 1994."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—£š—®š—暝˜š—¶š—²š˜€: Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise vs. M/s Edelweiss Financial Services Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether service tax is leviable on corporate guarantees? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The respondent issued corporate guarantees on behalf of subsidiaries without charging consideration. The revenue claimed taxability akin to bank guarantees.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Court ruled that corporate guarantees were excluded from "banking and other financial services" pre-2012 under Section 65(12) of the Finance Act. Post-2012, taxability required a service provider and consideration, which corporate guarantees lacked. The appeal was dismissed, confirming no service tax liability on corporate guarantees.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise vs. M/s Edelweiss Financial Services Ltd. š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 17 March 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling reinforces that absence of consideration precludes the imposition of service tax on corporate guarantees.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own