Abhishek Raja "Ram"
7 days ago
š¦šš½šæš²šŗš² šš¼ššæš š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š¼š» šš¼šæš½š¼šæš®šš² ššš®šæš®š»šš²š²š š¢ š§šµš² šš¼ššæš šµš²š¹š±: "Service tax cannot be levied on corporate guarantees in the absence of consideration, as the activity does not meet the criteria for taxability under the Finance Act, 1994."
š šš®š°šš: š£š®šæšš¶š²š: Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise vs. M/s Edelweiss Financial Services Ltd. ššššš²: Whether service tax is leviable on corporate guarantees? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The respondent issued corporate guarantees on behalf of subsidiaries without charging consideration. The revenue claimed taxability akin to bank guarantees.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Court ruled that corporate guarantees were excluded from "banking and other financial services" pre-2012 under Section 65(12) of the Finance Act. Post-2012, taxability required a service provider and consideration, which corporate guarantees lacked. The appeal was dismissed, confirming no service tax liability on corporate guarantees.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise vs. M/s Edelweiss Financial Services Ltd. š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 17 March 2023 š This ruling reinforces that absence of consideration precludes the imposition of service tax on corporate guarantees.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own