Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—ฅ๐—•๐—œ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "Commission received by Scheduled Banks for rendering banking or financial services to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is exempt from service tax. Revenue appeal dismissed."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€: CST โ€“ Bangalore vs. Canara Bank ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Canara Bank claimed exemption on commission received from RBI for banking services under Notification 22/2006-ST. The Supreme Court upheld the exemption, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Supreme Court upheld its previous ruling in State of Madras vs. Cement Allocation Coordinating Organisations, affirming that services by Scheduled Banks as statutory agents of RBI under Section 45 of the RBI Act are exempt from tax. The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, agreeing with the Tribunalโ€™s decision.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: CST โ€“ Bangalore vs. Canara Bank ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 25 January 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling clarifies the exemption of commission earned by Scheduled Banks for services rendered to RBI.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own