Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
š¦šš¦š§šš§ š ššŗšÆš®š¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š³šš»š± š³š¼šæ šš š½š¼šæš š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Refund towards export of services cannot be denied on the ground that there is no nexus between the input service and the export of service."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s Sequoia Capital India Advisors Pvt. Ltd. ššššš²: Whether the refund claims for export of services can be rejected due to lack of nexus between input services and output services. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant's refund claims for export services were partly rejected due to lack of nexus between input and exported services.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal cited the BNP Paribas India Solution Pvt. Ltd. case, ruling that refunds under Rule 5 cannot be denied due to lack of nexus between input and output services. Further, since Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules was not complied with, the refund claims could not be denied. The appeal was allowed and the order was set aside.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s Sequoia Capital India Advisors Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of CGST & C. Ex. š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 01 December 2022 š This ruling confirms that refund claims for exported services cannot be denied solely due to lack of nexus between input services and output services.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own