Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜‡ – š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶: š—œš—»š˜š—²š—æš—²š˜€š˜ š—¼š—» š—£š—æš—²-š——š—²š—½š—¼š˜€š—¶š˜ š—®š˜€ š—½š—²š—æ š—¦š—²š—°š˜š—¶š—¼š—» 35FF @ 12% šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Interest on pre-deposit to be calculated at 12% per annum from the date of deposit till the date of refund as per Section 35FF."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s. Premium Real Estate Developers š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the interest on pre-deposit should be calculated at 12% per annum as per Section 35FF, or at 6% as initially granted. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The Tribunal set aside the demand and penalty, granting refund with interest at 12%, not 6%, per Section 35FF.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that interest on pre-deposit should be granted at 12% per annum under Section 35FF, not 6%. Following the Parle Agro Ltd. decision, the appellant is entitled to the differential interest. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to calculate and grant the interest within 60 days.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Premium Real Estate Developers vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi – Service Tax š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 14 November 2022 šŸ“œ This ruling affirms the entitlement of taxpayers to interest at 12% per annum on pre-deposit amounts refunded under Section 35FF.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own