Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… – š— š—®š—±š—æš—®š˜€ š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—æš˜ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—š˜‚š—æš—¶š˜€š—±š—¶š—°š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—¼š—³ š——š—šš—šš—œ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—–š—¼š˜‚š—æš˜ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Indirect tax departments' consistent practice of issuing SCNs by one authority and adjudication by another is valid under law. SCN issued by DGGI is not without jurisdiction. Writ petition dismissed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—£š—²š˜š—¶š˜š—¶š—¼š—»š—²š—æš˜€: M/s. Amirta International Institute of Hotel Management and others. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: The Court upheld DGGI's jurisdiction to issue SCNs under the Finance Act, 1994, rejecting challenges on exemptions and transitional provisions under Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Court upheld the validity of SCNs issued by DGGI, affirming consistent pre- and post-GST practices. Section 174(2)(c) ensures continuity of liabilities and exemptions under the old Act. Jurisdiction of DGGI officers to issue SCNs was deemed lawful, and the writ petitions were dismissed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Amirta International Institute of Hotel Management and others vs. The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise and DGGI. š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 02 February 2023 šŸ“œ The ruling affirms the validity of SCNs issued by DGGI under consistent procedures spanning pre- and post-GST periods.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own