Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š ā ššš¦š§šš§ š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶: š§š²šæšŗš¶š»š®šš¶š¼š» šš²š² š£š®š¶š± šš»š±š²šæ š§šæš¶š½š®šæšš¶šš² šš“šæš²š²šŗš²š»š š”š¼š š¦ššÆš·š²š°š šš¼ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Termination fee paid to ZEE Limited under a tripartite agreement for the transfer of rights does not constitute a service, and no service tax is payable."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s All India Football Federation (AIFF) ššššš²: Whether the termination fee paid by IMGR to ZEEL under a tripartite agreement is taxable under "granting rights or permitting commercial use or exploitation of events." šš°šš¶šš¶šš: AIFF's rights transfer via tripartite agreement; termination fee paid by IMGR to ZEEL deemed non-taxable, demand invalidated.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that the termination fee paid by IMGR to ZEEL under a tripartite agreement, with AIFF's concurrence, does not constitute a taxable service. Since the original rights granted to ZEEL were non-taxable, the transfer and concurrence do not attract service tax liability under the Finance Act provisions.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s All India Football Federation vs. Commissioner of Service Tax ā Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 9 December 2022 š This ruling confirms that mere concurrence to a rights transfer under a tripartite agreement does not amount to providing a taxable service.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own