Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… – š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶: š—§š—²š—æš—ŗš—¶š—»š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—™š—²š—² š—£š—®š—¶š—± š˜‚š—»š—±š—²š—æ š—§š—æš—¶š—½š—®š—æš˜š—¶š˜š—² š—”š—“š—æš—²š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜ š—”š—¼š˜ š—¦š˜‚š—Æš—·š—²š—°š˜ š˜š—¼ š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Termination fee paid to ZEE Limited under a tripartite agreement for the transfer of rights does not constitute a service, and no service tax is payable."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s All India Football Federation (AIFF) š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the termination fee paid by IMGR to ZEEL under a tripartite agreement is taxable under "granting rights or permitting commercial use or exploitation of events." š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: AIFF's rights transfer via tripartite agreement; termination fee paid by IMGR to ZEEL deemed non-taxable, demand invalidated.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the termination fee paid by IMGR to ZEEL under a tripartite agreement, with AIFF's concurrence, does not constitute a taxable service. Since the original rights granted to ZEEL were non-taxable, the transfer and concurrence do not attract service tax liability under the Finance Act provisions.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s All India Football Federation vs. Commissioner of Service Tax – Service Tax š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 9 December 2022 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that mere concurrence to a rights transfer under a tripartite agreement does not amount to providing a taxable service.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own