Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

12 months ago

•View on X

š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… – š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š˜‚š—½š—½š—¹š˜† š—¼š—³ š—œš—¦š—¢ š—§š—®š—»š—øš—²š—æš˜€ š—¼š—» š—Ÿš—²š—®š˜€š—²/š—„š—²š—»š˜š—®š—¹ š—•š—®š˜€š—¶š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: Lease of ISO Tankers qualifies as a deemed sale since control rested with the appellant, exempting it from service tax liability.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s SRF Ltd. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Between 16.05.2008 and 30.06.2012, the appellant leased ISO Tankers from foreign suppliers for transporting refrigerant gases via sea routes. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: A show-cause notice alleged the lease was STGU service, demanding service tax under sections 65(105)(zzzzj) and 66A.

šŸ“œ š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that the lease of ISO Tankers constituted a transfer of the right to use goods, as the appellant had control and possession. This qualified as a deemed sale under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s SRF Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 03 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that the lease/rental supply of ISO Tankers with effective control and possession constitutes a deemed sale, exempting it from service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own