Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… โ€“ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "Debiting disputed service tax amounts in the profit and loss account does not amount to passing the burden to customers indirectly. Refund allowed to the appellant."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜: M/s Sarovar Portico ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether debiting service tax amounts in the P&L account constitutes passing on the tax burden. ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: Room sales (October 2013 โ€“ March 2016). The appellant deposited service tax under protest after audit findings and later sought a refund.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal ruled that service tax paid under protest isnโ€™t considered passed on to customers, as it wasnโ€™t charged in invoices. Debiting amounts in the profit and loss account doesnโ€™t imply unjust enrichment, as they can be adjusted through the capital account. Refund was granted with consequential benefits.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s Sarovar Portico vs. Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST, Jaipur I ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 30 January 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ Significance: Upholds taxpayer rights for refunds when service tax is paid under protest without burdening consumers.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own