Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
โขView on X
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ โ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ง ๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ต๐ถ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐น๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐จ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ข ๐ง๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ: "Debiting disputed service tax amounts in the profit and loss account does not amount to passing the burden to customers indirectly. Refund allowed to the appellant."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐: M/s Sarovar Portico ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Whether debiting service tax amounts in the P&L account constitutes passing on the tax burden. ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐: Room sales (October 2013 โ March 2016). The appellant deposited service tax under protest after audit findings and later sought a refund.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Tribunal ruled that service tax paid under protest isnโt considered passed on to customers, as it wasnโt charged in invoices. Debiting amounts in the profit and loss account doesnโt imply unjust enrichment, as they can be adjusted through the capital account. Refund was granted with consequential benefits.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: M/s Sarovar Portico vs. Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST, Jaipur I ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 30 January 2023 ๐ Significance: Upholds taxpayer rights for refunds when service tax is paid under protest without burdening consumers.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own