Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… โ€“ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ: ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐—ถ๐—ป-๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ช๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„-๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—น ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "Passing of an Order-in-Original without serving a show-cause notice to the appellant is without jurisdiction and nonest in the eyes of law."

๐Ÿ” ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s Sukh Samriddhi Insurance Consultants Pvt Ltd ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether the Order-in-Original is valid in the absence of service of a show-cause notice to the appellant. ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: The appellant argued that the Order-in-Original was passed ex parte without serving any show-cause notice, which was returned to the department marked as โ€œleft.โ€

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal held that the Order-in-Original was invalid as no show-cause notice was properly served. Despite multiple opportunities, the revenue failed to prove service, and the notice was returned as "left." Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, deeming the order without jurisdiction.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s Sukh Samriddhi Insurance Consultants Pvt Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax โ€“ Service Tax ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 15 November 2022 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling underscores that adherence to due process, including proper service of a show-cause notice, is essential for the validity of an Order-in-Original.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own