Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… – š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶: š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ-š—¶š—»-š—¢š—æš—¶š—“š—¶š—»š—®š—¹ š—£š—®š˜€š˜€š—²š—± š—Ŗš—¶š˜š—µš—¼š˜‚š˜ š—š˜‚š—æš—¶š˜€š—±š—¶š—°š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š——š˜‚š—² š˜š—¼ š—”š—¼š—»-š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—¼š—³ š—¦š—µš—¼š˜„-š—–š—®š˜‚š˜€š—² š—”š—¼š˜š—¶š—°š—² šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: If a show-cause notice is not served and returned marked 'left,' the resulting Order-in-Original lacks jurisdiction and validity.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Sukh Samriddhi Insurance Consultants Pvt Ltd š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the Order-in-Original is valid when the show-cause notice was not served on the appellant.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal found that no show-cause notice was served on the appellant, despite multiple opportunities for the revenue to provide proof. Consequently, the Order-in-Original was deemed void for lack of jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Sukh Samriddhi Insurance Consultants Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 15 November 2022 šŸ“œ This ruling highlights the necessity of proper service of show-cause notices for jurisdictional validity of orders.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own