Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
8 days ago
š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š ā šš²ššš®š š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶: š¢š°š²š®š» ššæš²š¶š“šµš š”š¼š š š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²; š£šæš¼š³š¶š ššæš¼šŗ šššš¶š»š²šš šš°šš¶šš¶šš¶š²š š”š¼š šš¼š»šš¶š±š²šæš²š± šš¼š»šš¶š±š²šæš®šš¶š¼š» šš¼šæ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² ā š„š²šš²š»šš² šš½š½š²š®š¹ šš¶ššŗš¶ššš²š± š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: Ocean freight and profit from it are not subject to service tax.
š šš®š°šš: šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š: M/s. Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. ššššš²: Whether service tax is payable on ocean freight and other associated charges. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant faced a show-cause notice for unpaid service tax on ocean freight and origin charges, leading to appeals.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that ocean freight is a business transaction, not a service, and profit from it is not considered service consideration. Citing cases like M/s Tiger Logistics and M/s Greenwich Meridian, it affirmed that no service tax is payable on such transactions, as they are independent principal-to-principal dealings.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s. Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd. vs The Commissioner of Service Tax š¦šš„š©ššš š§šš« šš£š£ššš š”š¢. 52168 of 2016 š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 01 May 2023 š This ruling establishes that ocean freight and related profit from such business activities are not subject to service tax, reinforcing previous decisions on similar issues.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own