Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

12 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… โ€“ ๐—–๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ: ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜„ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฑ, ๐—”๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ-๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—”๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—”๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: The Assistant Commissioner overstepped by re-adjudicating export service issues; the writ petition was allowed, and refund processed.

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: M/s Singtel Global India Pvt. Ltd. (Telecom service provider) ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Entitlement to a refund of unutilized input tax credit for export services.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Court ruled that the Assistant Commissioner overstepped by re-adjudicating an issue already decided by the Commissioner (Appeals). It confirmed that the petitionerโ€™s services werenโ€™t intermediary services, and directed the Assistant Commissioner to process the refund within four weeks, considering interest for delays.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s Singtel Global India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 14 December 2022 ๐Ÿ“œ This ruling reinforces the authority of higher-level orders and the procedural discipline that lower authorities must follow in refund matters, especially where export services are concerned.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own