
Abhishek Raja "Ram"
12 months ago
โขView on X
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ โ ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ต๐ถ: ๐๐ป๐ฝ๐๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐น๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ, ๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ-๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐๐๐ต๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ข ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ: The Assistant Commissioner overstepped by re-adjudicating export service issues; the writ petition was allowed, and refund processed.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ: M/s Singtel Global India Pvt. Ltd. (Telecom service provider) ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Entitlement to a refund of unutilized input tax credit for export services.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Court ruled that the Assistant Commissioner overstepped by re-adjudicating an issue already decided by the Commissioner (Appeals). It confirmed that the petitionerโs services werenโt intermediary services, and directed the Assistant Commissioner to process the refund within four weeks, considering interest for delays.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: M/s Singtel Global India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 14 December 2022 ๐ This ruling reinforces the authority of higher-level orders and the procedural discipline that lower authorities must follow in refund matters, especially where export services are concerned.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own