Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… – š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š— š˜‚š—ŗš—Æš—®š—¶: š—„š—²š—ŗš—®š—»š—± š—™š—¼š—æ š—„š—²š—°š—¼š—æš—±š—¶š—»š—“ š—™š—¶š—»š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€ š—¼š—» š—¦š˜‚š—Æš—ŗš—¶š˜€š˜€š—¶š—¼š—»š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: The Commissioner ignored appellant's submissions and case laws, making the decision unsustainable; matter remanded for fresh decision.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Overseas Infrastructure Alliance India Private Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the denial of Cenvat Credit and interest on delayed refund to the appellant is justified. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant's Cenvat Credit refund was rejected, as electricity poles were deemed "civil structures" under Rule 2(l) exclusion.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal found the Commissioner's order unsustainable as it lacked detailed consideration of the appellant's submissions and case laws. The order was passed without proper examination of the arguments. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a fresh decision, including a thorough review of the appellant's points and references.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Overseas Infrastructure Alliance India Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Service Tax – Service Tax š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 6 December 2022 šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes the need for a reasoned decision with detailed findings on all issues raised by the parties involved.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own