Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š ā ššš¦š§šš§ šš¼š¹šøš®šš®: š”š¼ š§š¶šŗš² šš¶šŗš¶š š³š¼šæ šš²š»šš®š ššæš²š±š¶š š§š®šøš²š» šš²š³š¼šæš² 11.07.2014 š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: The 2014 Cenvat credit time limit applies prospectively, not retrospectively, to invoices issued before the amendment date.
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: ITC Sonar (Unit of ITC Limited) ššššš²: Cenvat credit was not rightly disallowed for invoices issued before 11.07.2014, and penalty under Rule 15 was unjustified. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant was issued a show cause notice for irregular Cenvat credit on invoices dated 2014-2015, beyond the six-month period.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that the six-month limitation introduced in Rule 4(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules applies only to invoices issued after 01.09.2014. It clarified that the amendment is not retrospective, referencing the Voss Exotech case, and thus does not apply to invoices before 11.07.2014.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: ITC Sonar vs. Commissioner of Service Tax ā Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 17 November 2022 š The ruling clarifies that the 2014 Cenvat credit time limit applies only to invoices issued after 11.07.2014.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own