Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
โขView on X
๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ โ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ง ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป๐ป๐ฎ๐ถ: ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐บ๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ค๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ-๐ช๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ข ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฏ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ: Refund claims must be assessed quarterly, not collectively; appellate tribunals cannot club quarters to determine limitation periods.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐: M/s. Minvesta Infotech Ltd. ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Can the appellant claim refunds of accumulated CENVAT credit deemed time-barred by the adjudicating authority based on statutory limitations? ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐: The appellant's six refund claims for CENVAT credit (October 2015โMarch 2017) were partially rejected as time-barred and inadmissible.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Tribunal held that refund claims filed quarterly must be assessed individually for limitation. While rejecting the claims as time-barred, it noted the appellant could seek recredit under Notification No. 27/2012, as amounts were debited before filing. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, limiting its scope to Rule 5 adjudication.
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: M/s. Minvesta Infotech Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai โ Service Tax ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 16 November 2022 ๐ Refund claims for CENVAT credit must follow quarterly time limits, with recredit relief available under Notification No. 27/2012 provisions.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own