Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

โ€ขView on X

๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… โ€“ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—”๐—ง ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถ: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐— ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—•๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ค๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐—ช๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: Refund claims must be assessed quarterly, not collectively; appellate tribunals cannot club quarters to determine limitation periods.

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: M/s. Minvesta Infotech Ltd. ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Can the appellant claim refunds of accumulated CENVAT credit deemed time-barred by the adjudicating authority based on statutory limitations? ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: The appellant's six refund claims for CENVAT credit (October 2015โ€“March 2017) were partially rejected as time-barred and inadmissible.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Tribunal held that refund claims filed quarterly must be assessed individually for limitation. While rejecting the claims as time-barred, it noted the appellant could seek recredit under Notification No. 27/2012, as amounts were debited before filing. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, limiting its scope to Rule 5 adjudication.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: M/s. Minvesta Infotech Ltd. vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai โ€“ Service Tax ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 16 November 2022 ๐Ÿ“œ Refund claims for CENVAT credit must follow quarterly time limits, with recredit relief available under Notification No. 27/2012 provisions.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own