Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š ā ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š±: š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š„š²š»š±š²šæš²š± šÆš šš½š½š²š¹š¹š®š»š šš®š»š»š¼š šš² šš¹š®ššš¶š³š¶š²š± šØš»š±š²šæ š š®š»š½š¼šš²šæ š„š²š°šæšš¶ššŗš²š»š š®š»š± š¦šš½š½š¹š šš“š²š»š°š š¦š²šæšš¶š°š²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: No manpower supply or recruitment by appellants; services rendered to sugar factory cannot be classified under manpower recruitment agency services.
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Talala Taluka Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandali Limited ššššš²: Expenses charged to farmers for sugarcane harvesting and transportation do not qualify as "Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services." šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant's sugarcane harvesting and transportation expenses deducted from farmer payments were wrongly classified as "Manpower Recruitment and Supply Services."
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal, relying on precedent, ruled that the appellant's activities lacked elements of manpower supply or recruitment. Contracts confirmed no provision of manpower to the sugar factory. The issue, deemed no longer res integra, reaffirmed that such activities do not qualify as "Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services." Demand was unsustainable.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Talala Taluka Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandali Limited vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad ā Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 6 December 2022 š This ruling confirms that sugarcane harvesting and transportation activities without manpower supply are not taxable as manpower recruitment services.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own