Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š ā ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š±: šš¶šš°š¼šš»š šš¶šš²š» šÆš š /š. š š®šæššš¶ š¦ššššøš¶ šš»š±š¶š® ššš±. š§š¼ šš²š®š¹š²šæ šÆš®šš²š± š¼š» š¬š²š®šæš¹š š¦š®š¹š²š š£š²šæš³š¼šæšŗš®š»š°š² š»š¼š šš¶š®šÆš¹š² š³š¼šæ š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: Discounts based on yearly sales performance from M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. to the appellant are not liable for service tax.
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: B M Autolink ššššš²: Discount received by the appellant from M/s. Maruti Suzuki is not subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant buys vehicles from Maruti Suzuki and sells them, receiving discounts based on yearly sales performance, reducing prices.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that discounts and incentives from M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., based on sales performance, are not considered service charges. Citing Moped India Ltd. and Rohan Motors Ltd., the Tribunal held that these discounts, under principal-to-principal transactions, are not subject to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS).
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: B M Autolink vs. Commissioner of Service Tax ā Service Tax š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 28 November 2022 š This ruling confirms that discounts or incentives related to sales performance are not subject to service tax when they are not linked to the provision of a service.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own