Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š ā šš¼šŗšÆš®š šš¶š“šµ šš¼ššæš š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š„š²š®šš¼š»š®šÆš¹š² š£š²šæš¶š¼š± š³š¼šæ šš±š·šš±š¶š°š®šš¶š¼š» š¢ š§šµš² šš¼ššæš šµš²š¹š±: "Proceedings not concluded within a reasonable period may not proceed further. Reinitiating after seven years is invalid. The petition is allowed."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: CMA-CGM Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. ššššš²: Validity of adjudication initiated after seven years. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: Service tax demand notice (2004ā2008) delayed due to transfer and centralized registration, reinitiated in 2020.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Court relied on Parle International Ltd. vs. Union of India, observing that the adjudication delay of seven years violated the principle of reasonable period. The show-cause notice dated October 2009 was invalidated, and the petition was allowed.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: CMA-CGM Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and Commissioner, CGST & C. Ex., Navi Mumbai š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 17 January 2023 š This ruling underscores that prolonged delays in adjudication are not permissible.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own