Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… – š—•š—¼š—ŗš—Æš—®š˜† š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—æš˜ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—®š˜€š—¼š—»š—®š—Æš—¹š—² š—£š—²š—æš—¶š—¼š—± š—³š—¼š—æ š—”š—±š—·š˜‚š—±š—¶š—°š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—–š—¼š˜‚š—æš˜ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Proceedings not concluded within a reasonable period may not proceed further. Reinitiating after seven years is invalid. The petition is allowed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: CMA-CGM Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Validity of adjudication initiated after seven years. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: Service tax demand notice (2004–2008) delayed due to transfer and centralized registration, reinitiated in 2020.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Court relied on Parle International Ltd. vs. Union of India, observing that the adjudication delay of seven years violated the principle of reasonable period. The show-cause notice dated October 2009 was invalidated, and the petition was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: CMA-CGM Agencies (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and Commissioner, CGST & C. Ex., Navi Mumbai š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 17 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling underscores that prolonged delays in adjudication are not permissible.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own