Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

šŸ“° š—„š—®š—·š—®š˜€š˜š—µš—®š—» š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—æš˜ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“: š—”š—±š˜ƒš—®š—»š—°š—² š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—”š—½š—½š—¹š—¶š—°š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—”š—¼š˜ š—„š—²š˜€š˜š—æš—¶š—°š˜š—²š—± š—¢š—»š—¹š˜† š˜š—¼ š—¦š˜‚š—½š—½š—¹š—¶š—²š—æ šŸ“¢ Justice Avneesh Jhingan and Justice Ashutosh Kumar observed,

"The appeal against the advance ruling is provided under Section 100 of the CGST Act. The concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer, or the applicant can prefer an appeal against the ruling given under Section 98(4). No appeal is provided against rejection of the application under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—”š˜‚š—ŗš—Æš—²š—æ: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11370/2021 š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: The petitioner challenged the AAR's order rejecting their application for an advance ruling on the grounds that the petitioner was not the supplier.

š—£š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: The petitioner, engaged in the transmission of electricity, filed for an advance ruling on whether the transportation of goods was exempt under a specific notification. The AAR rejected the application, stating it was not maintainable as the petitioner was not the supplier.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Rajasthan High Court quashed the AAR's order, ruling that an advance ruling application is not restricted solely to suppliers. The court noted that Sections 95 and 97 of the CGST Act do not impose such a restriction. The case was remanded back to the AAR to decide the application afresh under Section 98(4) of the CGST Act.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own