Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐๐ป๐ท๐ฎ๐ฏ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด: ๐๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐จ๐ป๐ท๐๐๐ ๐๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ป๐ฝ๐๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ ๐ข Courtโs Statement: "The blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) must not proceed solely on supplier scrutiny without proper investigation into the taxpayer's conduct."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: K.J. International vs State of Punjab โข ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐: Punjab and Haryana High Court โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 06-Oct-2023 โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ: CWP-22514 of 2023
๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: The petitioner, K.J. International, contested the blocking of ITC in its Electronic Credit Ledger, arguing that the restriction was based on a generalized supplier audit rather than any specific investigation of their transactions. The petitioner asserted that prolonged ITC blocking without adjudication could prevent it from filing returns, risking registration cancellation.
๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐: K.J. International argued that only suppliers, not its own records, were scrutinized. The petitioner requested that blocking orders be quashed, enabling compliance with return filing and avoiding registration issues.
โ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering immediate unblocking of the ITC account while permitting a 10% pre-deposit of any assessed penalty amount as a condition for proceeding. This judgment emphasizes taxpayer rights against preliminary restrictions without due process.
๐ ๐๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐: This ruling reinforces the necessity of transparent, thorough inquiry before imposing restrictive measures, supporting taxpayersโ procedural rights in tax matters. Team GSTpanacea 7503031378
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own