Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜€ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—˜๐˜…๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—บ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐Ÿ“ข The court ruled, "Your wife's illness cannot excuse you from appearing before the GST Authority." ๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ท ๐—๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜: Patna High Court ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7599 of 2023 ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 10-Oct-2023

๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Mr. Neeraj Jain received supplies from M/s Vedam Enterprises, a Maharashtra-registered entity under the Central Tax Authority, whose registration was found to be fictitious. Additionally, Mr. Jain made supplies to M/s Arti Plastics, registered in Bihar with the State Tax Authority. Consequently, Mr. Jain was summoned by both authorities, prompting him to raise concerns about the powers to summon under Section 6 of the GST Laws.

โš– ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The court dismissed Mr. Jainโ€™s claim that his wife's illness justified his non-appearance before the GST authorities, affirming that personal hardships do not override legal obligations under the GST Act.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—œ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€: This ruling reinforces that compliance with GST summons is mandatory, regardless of personal hardships, ensuring strict adherence to GST regulatory processes. ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ ๐Ÿ“ž 7503031378

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own