Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
2 months ago
๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ป๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด: ๐๐ฅ๐-๐ฌ๐ณ ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฌ-๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ผ๐ฑ ๐จ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ฎ๐
๐ข In a recent judgment, the court held, "Orders must comply with the statutory minimum 30-day period under Section 74(A) of GST." ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: Motiprabha Infrated Pvt. Ltd vs The Union of India โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ: Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16792 of 2022 โข ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐: Patna High Court โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 09-Dec-2022
๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: The petitioner, Motiprabha Infrated Pvt. Ltd, challenged the validity of a DRC-07 order issued without the mandated 30-day period after a Show Cause Notice (SCN) was served. The timeline shows that: โข 15-Feb-2021: A Show Cause Notice (DRC-01) under Section 73(1) was issued. โข 24-Feb-2021: The order was passed just 9 days after issuance of the SCN. โข Sep-2022: The First Appellate Authority upheld the order.
๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐โ๐ ๐ฆ๐ผ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: The High Court concluded that issuing a DRC-07 order without observing the minimum statutory 30-day period constituted a violation of Section 74(A) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The court quashed both the SCN and the assessment order, instructing the assessing officer to issue a new notice in compliance with statutory requirements and to pass an order accordingly.
โ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The High Court emphasized adherence to procedural mandates and quashed the assessment, directing a fresh issuance of the SCN.
๐ This ruling underscores the need for procedural compliance under GST law and highlights the judiciaryโs role in upholding statutory timeframes to ensure fair administrative processes. Team GSTpanacea 7503031378
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own