Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฉ๐—Ÿ๐——๐—ฅ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฑ: "Taxpayers with pending investigations are expressly included under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: ๐—–๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜†: Hans Uttam Finance Limited ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Whether tax dues were quantified as required under Section 121(r) of the Finance Act, 2019, before 30.06.2019? ๐—”๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜†: The petitioner declared service tax dues under the SVLDR Scheme and claimed eligibility for waiver of interest and penalties after depositing the tax amount. The declaration was rejected as the investigation was not concluded.

โš–๏ธ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The High Court ruled that the petitionerโ€™s tax dues were properly quantified under the SVLDR Scheme. Taxpayers under investigation or audit are eligible for the Schemeโ€™s benefits. The writ petition was allowed, granting the petitioner relief, including waiver of interest and penalties.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Hans Uttam Finance Limited vs. Principal Commissioner of Central Excise, GST, Delhi South Commissionerate & Ors ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 15 May 2023 ๐Ÿ“œ This judgment clarifies that the SVLDR Scheme explicitly includes taxpayers with pending investigations or audits, provided their dues are quantified.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own