Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ต๐ถ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐น๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ ๐ข ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ: "Taxpayers with pending investigations are expressly included under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐: Hans Uttam Finance Limited ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Whether tax dues were quantified as required under Section 121(r) of the Finance Act, 2019, before 30.06.2019? ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐๐: The petitioner declared service tax dues under the SVLDR Scheme and claimed eligibility for waiver of interest and penalties after depositing the tax amount. The declaration was rejected as the investigation was not concluded.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The High Court ruled that the petitionerโs tax dues were properly quantified under the SVLDR Scheme. Taxpayers under investigation or audit are eligible for the Schemeโs benefits. The writ petition was allowed, granting the petitioner relief, including waiver of interest and penalties.
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: Hans Uttam Finance Limited vs. Principal Commissioner of Central Excise, GST, Delhi South Commissionerate & Ors ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 15 May 2023 ๐ This judgment clarifies that the SVLDR Scheme explicitly includes taxpayers with pending investigations or audits, provided their dues are quantified.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own