Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

23 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—暝˜ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š——š—²š—¹š—®š˜†š—²š—± š—”š—±š—·š˜‚š—±š—¶š—°š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—¼š—³ š—¦š—µš—¼š˜„ š—–š—®š˜‚š˜€š—² š—”š—¼š˜š—¶š—°š—² šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—暝˜ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Proceedings for adjudication of the show cause notice after a delay of 13 years are impermissible, and such proceedings must be concluded within a reasonable time."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Nanu Ram Goyal š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether proceedings for adjudication of the show cause notice could be continued after a delay of 13 years? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The petitioner was issued a show cause notice in 2009 alleging service tax liability for "Construction of Complex Service" for the period from 2005 to 2008.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Court ruled that a 13-year delay in adjudicating a show cause notice is unjustifiable, violating principles of reasonableness. Jurisdiction must be exercised within a reasonable time, even without a statutory limit. The respondents were barred from continuing the proceedings, and the petition was allowed.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Nanu Ram Goyal vs. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Delhi & Ors š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 20 April 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes that adjudication must occur within a reasonable timeframe, and excessive delays undermine the validity of proceedings.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own