Abhishek Raja "Ram"
7 days ago
š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶ šš¶š“šµ šš¼ššæš š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» šš¼š»š±š¼š»š®šš¶š¼š» š¼š³ šš²š¹š®š š¶š» šš½š½š²š®š¹ šš¶š¹š¶š»š“ š¢ š§šµš² šš¼ššæš šµš²š¹š±: "Each day of delay in filing an appeal must be explained. In this case, no sufficient reason was provided for an inordinate delay of almost 10 months."
š šš®š°šš: š£š®šæšš¶š²š: Principal Commissioner Central Tax, Delhi South vs. Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. ššššš²: Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing and re-filing the appeal is justified? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant filed the appeal 10 months after the impugned order, citing misplacement of papers and inadvertence. The appeal was also refiled with significant delays and defects, including missing court fees and failure to file a hard copy.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Court ruled that the appellant failed to explain delays during multiple time gaps, with over two years of inaction before re-filing. Even excluding COVID-19 disruptions, significant delays remained unexplained. Consequently, the applications for condonation of delay were dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Principal Commissioner Central Tax, Delhi South vs. Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 28 March 2023 š This ruling underscores that unexplained and prolonged delays in appeal filing cannot be condoned without a valid explanation for each day of delay.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own