Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

3 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐— ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ฑ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜€

๐Ÿ“ข The court held, "An adverse order cannot be passed without issuing a clear, detailed show cause notice, allowing the affected party a fair chance to respond."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: โ€ข ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Hatsun Agro Product Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner โ€ข ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: W.P.No.17861 of 2023, WMP Nos.16983 & 16984 of 2023 โ€ข ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜: Madras High Court โ€ข ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 15-Jun-2023

๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Hatsun Agro contested an order for the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, arguing that the Assessing Officer had not issued a proper show cause notice before the initial order, denying them a fair hearing.

๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ: โ€ข 09-Sep-2022: Communication from the Assessing Officer stated Hatsunโ€™s ITC was ineligible. โ€ข 17-Mar-2023: Initial assessment order passed without adequate opportunity for Hatsun Agro to respond. โ€ข 15-Jun-2023: The court set aside this assessment, treating it as a show cause notice, allowing Hatsun to present their case fully.

โ€ข 13-Jul-2023: Scheduled hearing for Hatsun Agro to present supporting evidence. โ€ข 25-Aug-2023: Deadline for the new order to be issued post-hearing.

โš– ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Madras High Court emphasized that before issuing an adverse order, the taxpayer must receive a show cause notice detailing specific allegations and providing sufficient time to respond. The court ordered that the initial assessment be treated as a show cause notice and allowed Hatsun Agro an opportunity to present their case before any final determination.

๐Ÿ“œ This ruling reinforces the principles of natural justice, ensuring that taxpayers are granted a fair and transparent process, especially when their financial interests are at stake. The courtโ€™s stance on procedural fairness sets a significant precedent, mandating that authorities must issue specific, clear, and detailed show cause notices before making decisions. Teamย GSTpanacea 7503031378

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own