
Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
over 1 year ago
ā¢View on š
āļøš¼ š š®š±šæš®š šš¶š“šµ šš¼ššæš šš¹š¹š¼šš šš§š šš²šš½š¶šš² šš®šš² š„š²šššæš» šš¶š¹š¶š»š“ ā ššššš¶š°š² š¢šš²šæ š£šæš¼š°š²š±ššæš²! š¼āļø In a key ruling, the High Court held that Input Tax Credit (šš§š) š°š®š»š»š¼š šÆš² š±š²š»š¶š²š± simply because the assessee šŗš¶ššš²š± šš¶šŗš²š¹š šæš²šššæš» š³š¶š¹š¶š»š“ before seeking to transition credit. š ā
In Sowmiya Spinners (P) Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (2024) 23 Centax 58 (Mad.), the Madras High Court ruled that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied simply because the assessee missed filing returns on time before transitioning credit. š ā
ā”ļø The petitioner filed the returns later, curing the lapse, and the Court cited the Supreme Court's decision in State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Aurya Chambers of Commerce that š½šæš¼š°š²š±ššæš²š š®šæš² šµš®š»š±šŗš®š¶š±š š¼š³ š·šššš¶š°š², š»š¼š ššµš² šŗš¶šššæš²šš š¼š³ š¹š®š. The impugned order was quashed, and the writ petition was allowed! ā š
š” šš²š š§š®šøš²š®šš®š: Late filing may be excused if justice is served, and ITC cannot be denied on procedural grounds alone. āļøš”
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own