Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

•View on š•

āš–ļøšŸ’¼ š— š—®š—±š—æš—®š˜€ š—›š—¶š—“š—µ š—–š—¼š˜‚š—æš˜ š—”š—¹š—¹š—¼š˜„š˜€ š—œš—§š—– š——š—²š˜€š—½š—¶š˜š—² š—Ÿš—®š˜š—² š—„š—²š˜š˜‚š—æš—» š—™š—¶š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ – š—š˜‚š˜€š˜š—¶š—°š—² š—¢š˜ƒš—²š—æ š—£š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—±š˜‚š—æš—²! šŸ’¼āš–ļø In a key ruling, the High Court held that Input Tax Credit (š—œš—§š—–) š—°š—®š—»š—»š—¼š˜ š—Æš—² š—±š—²š—»š—¶š—²š—± simply because the assessee š—ŗš—¶š˜€š˜€š—²š—± š˜š—¶š—ŗš—²š—¹š˜† š—æš—²š˜š˜‚š—æš—» š—³š—¶š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ before seeking to transition credit. šŸ“…āŒ

In Sowmiya Spinners (P) Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (2024) 23 Centax 58 (Mad.), the Madras High Court ruled that Input Tax Credit (ITC) cannot be denied simply because the assessee missed filing returns on time before transitioning credit. šŸ“…āŒ

āž”ļø The petitioner filed the returns later, curing the lapse, and the Court cited the Supreme Court's decision in State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Aurya Chambers of Commerce that š—½š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—±š˜‚š—æš—²š˜€ š—®š—æš—² š—µš—®š—»š—±š—ŗš—®š—¶š—±š˜€ š—¼š—³ š—·š˜‚š˜€š˜š—¶š—°š—², š—»š—¼š˜ š˜š—µš—² š—ŗš—¶š˜€š˜š—æš—²š˜€š˜€ š—¼š—³ š—¹š—®š˜„. The impugned order was quashed, and the writ petition was allowed! āœ…šŸ“„

šŸ’” š—žš—²š˜† š—§š—®š—øš—²š—®š˜„š—®š˜†: Late filing may be excused if justice is served, and ITC cannot be denied on procedural grounds alone. āš–ļøšŸ’”

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own