Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

almost 2 years ago

•View on š•

š— /š˜€ š—¦š—µš—æš—¶ š—žš—æš—¶š˜€š—µš—»š—® š—„š—¼š—®š—± š—–š—®š—æš—æš—¶š—²š—æ š—©š˜€ š—–š—¼š—ŗš—ŗš—¶š˜€š˜€š—¶š—¼š—»š—²š—æ š—¼š—³ š—–š—²š—»š˜š—æš—®š—¹ š—˜š˜…š—°š—¶š˜€š—² & š—–š—šš—¦š—§, š— š—²š—²š—æš˜‚š˜

šŸ“¢ š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Shri Krishna Road Carrier š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Rejection of appeal for failure to make the mandatory pre-deposit in the prescribed manner.

š—£š—æš—¼š—°š—²š—²š—±š—¶š—»š—“š˜€: The Appellant deposited the pre-deposit and submitted a copy of DRC-03. However, the appeal was rejected for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: CBIC's Circular dated 18.04.2023 clarified that DRC-03 is an acceptable mode for pre-deposit under the GST Act. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Shri Krishna Road Carrier vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & CGST, Meerut š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 03 June 2024

This ruling emphasizes the importance of considering the merits of a case over procedural technicalities. #LegalUpdate #CESTAT #CentralExcise #arr4nirc

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on š•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own