Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐——๐˜‚๐˜๐˜† ๐˜๐—ผ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—”๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

๐Ÿ“ข The Court Held: "It is the assesseeโ€™s responsibility to check the GST portal for any notices or orders served, even post-cancellation of GST registration. Failure to monitor the portal does not render the assessment order invalid."

๐Ÿ” ๐—™๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€: โ€ข ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Koduvayur Constructions v. Assistant Commissioner-Works Contract โ€ข ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: WP(C) No. 21212 of 2023 โ€ข ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 07-Aug-2023

๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: The GST registration of Koduvayur Constructions was canceled effective September 1, 2021. Later, on October 14, 2022, an assessment order demanding Rs. 19,22,566/- was issued by the Assistant Commissioner and uploaded on the GST Common Portal. The petitioner argued that posting the assessment order on the portal after cancellation was invalid.

โš– ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜: The Kerala High Court dismissed the petition, holding that: โ€ข Section 169(1) of the CGST Act allows for valid service of notices and orders through the GST Common Portal. โ€ข It is the responsibility of the assessee to regularly check the portal for updates, regardless of their registration status.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†: This ruling underscores that taxpayers are required to monitor the GST portal for official communications, including post-cancellation notices. Non-compliance in checking the portal does not invalidate orders or notices served via this method. Team GSTpanacea 7503031378

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own