Abhishek Raja Ram: Against High Pitch Notices..!!

@abhishekrajaram

7 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

ITC reflected in GSTR-2A and claimed through GSTR-9 allowed by the Madras High Court. šŸ” Case Spotlight: Sri Shanmuga Hardwares Electricals vs. The State Tax Officer

In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court addressed the critical issue of Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims in GST returns. The court quashed the assessment orders that denied ITC to the petitioner, despite the claims being reflected in GSTR-2A and annual GSTR-9 returns.

šŸ“œ **Key Takeaways:** - The petitioner's nil returns were deemed erroneous, and the rightful ITC claims were initially rejected. - The court emphasized the need for the assessing officer to thoroughly examine all relevant documents to validate the ITC claims.

- The case was remanded for reconsideration, granting the petitioner an opportunity to present comprehensive documentation.

šŸ’” **Implications for Businesses:** This ruling underscores the importance of accurate GST filings and the right to claim ITC. It also highlights the judiciary's role in ensuring fair assessment by tax authorities.

šŸ‘Øā€āš–ļø **A Step Towards Fair Taxation:** The decision is a reminder that procedural oversights should not override the substantive rights of taxpayers. For a detailed analysis, stay tuned! #GST #MadrasHighCourt #CaseLaw

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own