Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

over 1 year ago

โ€ขView on ๐•

๐—œ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง + ๐—ฆ๐—š๐—ฆ๐—ง important Relief: Bookmark/Save this judgment ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ๐Ÿ“‹ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—›๐—– ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ง๐—– ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐——๐˜‚๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—–๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐— ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ โ€“ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ณ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ! ๐Ÿ“‹๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

In Tvl. Thendral Electricals v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes [2024] 167 taxmanncom 269 (Madras), the Madras High Court allowed the petitioner to file for rectification after an Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim was disallowed due to a clerical error. ๐Ÿ–‹๏ธโŒ

โžก๏ธ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—ง๐—– ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ "๐—–๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜…" ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ "๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜…" ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐˜… ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ต๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—œ๐—ง๐—– ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿฏ. ๐Ÿงพโš–๏ธ

โžก๏ธ The Court recognized this as a clerical error, allowing the petitioner to file a rectification petition under Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017. The tax authorities were directed to review and pass orders after providing an opportunity for a hearing. โœ…๐Ÿ“ #GST #ITC #TaxCompliance

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on ๐•

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own