Abhishek Raja "Ram"
about 22 hours ago
ššš·š®šæš®š šš¶š“šµ šš¼ššæš š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š¦š©ššš„ š¦š°šµš²šŗš² š£š®ššŗš²š»š š¢ š§šµš² šš¼ššæš šµš²š¹š±: Deposit under SVLDR scheme made on time; technical glitch recredited payment, absolving petitioner of liability. Petition allowed.
š šš®š°šš: š£š²šš¶šš¶š¼š»š²šæ: M/s SK Likproof Private Limited ššššš²: Technical glitches caused delayed payment under SVLDR scheme; court ruled petitioner eligible for SVLDRS-4 certificate, refunding recovery amount.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Gujarat High Court ruled that a technical glitch causing payment recredit cannot penalize the petitioner under the SVLDR scheme. Following M/s L.G. Chaudhary vs. Union of India, bona fide attempts to pay within the deadline are valid. Refund of ā¹7,68,675/- and issuance of SVLDRS-4 certificate were ordered.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s SK Likproof Private Limited vs. Union of India š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²:09 February 2023 š This ruling underscores that technical glitches cannot override bona fide compliance efforts under statutory schemes.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own