Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

8 months ago

•View on X

š—˜š˜…š—°š—¶š˜€š—² – š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—µš—ŗš—²š—±š—®š—Æš—®š—±: š—£š—²š—»š—®š—¹š˜š˜† š—”š—¼š˜ š—œš—ŗš—½š—¼š˜€š—®š—Æš—¹š—² š—³š—¼š—æ š—œš—»š—®š—±š˜ƒš—²š—æš˜š—²š—»š˜ š—Ÿš—®š—½š˜€š—² š—¶š—» š—–š—²š—»š˜ƒš—®š˜ š—–š—æš—²š—±š—¶š˜ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: Excess Cenvat credit reversed with interest eliminates the need for a show cause notice and penalty imposition.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Schott Glass India Pvt Ltd š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Penalty under Rule 15(2) is not applicable for inadvertent availing of 100% capital goods credit if promptly reversed with interest. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant mistakenly availed 100% credit on capital goods, reversed the excess 50% credit with interest upon realization.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal found the appellant's lapse in availing excess Cenvat credit to be inadvertent, not fraudulent. As the appellant was eligible for the remaining credit in the next year, and the excess credit was reversed with interest, no penalty was warranted, leading to the penalty being set aside.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Schott Glass India Pvt Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise – Excise Duty š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 1 December 2022 šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes that penalties are not justified for inadvertent lapses when procedural compliance is promptly corrected.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own