Abhishek Raja "Ram"
8 months ago
ā¢View on X
šš š°š¶šš² ā ššš¦š§šš§ ššµšŗš²š±š®šÆš®š±: š£š²š»š®š¹šš š”š¼š ššŗš½š¼šš®šÆš¹š² š³š¼šæ šš»š®š±šš²šæšš²š»š šš®š½šš² š¶š» šš²š»šš®š ššæš²š±š¶š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: Excess Cenvat credit reversed with interest eliminates the need for a show cause notice and penalty imposition.
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: Schott Glass India Pvt Ltd ššššš²: Penalty under Rule 15(2) is not applicable for inadvertent availing of 100% capital goods credit if promptly reversed with interest. šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant mistakenly availed 100% credit on capital goods, reversed the excess 50% credit with interest upon realization.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal found the appellant's lapse in availing excess Cenvat credit to be inadvertent, not fraudulent. As the appellant was eligible for the remaining credit in the next year, and the excess credit was reversed with interest, no penalty was warranted, leading to the penalty being set aside.
š šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: Schott Glass India Pvt Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise ā Excise Duty š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 1 December 2022 š This ruling emphasizes that penalties are not justified for inadvertent lapses when procedural compliance is promptly corrected.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own