Abhishek Raja Ram: Against High Pitch Notices..!!
3 months ago
๐๐ฒ๐น๐ต๐ถ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฑ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ป๐ผ๐ป-๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ.
Facts of the Case ๐ : โข 02.12.2023: Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued proposing a demand of โน3,11,54,338/- against the Petitioner.
โข 15.12.2023: Petitioner filed a detailed reply to the SCN. โข 04.03.2024: Reminder notice issued to the Petitioner. โข 02.04.2024: Petitioner replied to the reminder notice.
โข 29.04.2024: Impugned order passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, disregarding the Petitionerโs detailed replies and creating a demand including penalty.
Issue โ: โข Whether the impugned order dated 29.04.2024 is sustainable given that it allegedly ignored the detailed reply submitted by the Petitioner.
Ground of Appeal by the Petitioner ๐: โข The Petitioner argued that their detailed reply dated 15.12.2023 was not considered and that the impugned order was cryptic and failed to address the issues raised and documents submitted by the Petitioner.
Respondent's Argument ๐ผ: The Respondent maintained that the Petitioner had submitted incomplete supporting documents on the GST Portal, justifying the issuance of the demand under DRC-07.
Precedent Analysis โ๏ธ: โข The court emphasized the necessity for the Proper Officer to consider the replies on their merits and seek further details if required before forming an opinion. This aligns with the principles of natural justice and proper adjudication.
Court Judgment ๐๏ธ: High Court set aside the order from 29.04.2024, sending the Show Cause Notice back to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication.
The Petitioner has 30 days to reply further, and the Proper Officer must offer a personal hearing and issue a new detailed order.
Title: Oriental Trimex Export Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax Court: Delhi High Court Citation: W.P.(C) 8019/2024 and CM Appl. 32988/2024 Dated: 29-May-2024
Impact Analysis of this Judgment ๐: โข This judgment reinforces the importance of considering detailed replies and supporting documents before passing orders in GST cases.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own