Abhishek Raja "Ram"
9 days ago
๐ฐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ต๐ถ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด: ๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐จ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฆ๐ง, ๐๐๐๐๐ผ๐บ๐, ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐๐ฒ ๐ค๐๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐ข ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ค๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ: โMatters which have the potential of casting financial liabilities or penal consequences cannot be kept pending for years and decades togetherโฆ
The flexibility which the statute confers is not liable to be construed as sanctioning lethargy or indolence,โ observed Justices Yashwant Varma and Ravinder Dudeja. ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: M/S VOS Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Principal Additional Director General & Anr. (and batch)
๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ: W.P.(C) 4831/2021 and connected matters ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ: Whether Show Cause Notices (SCNs) and adjudication proceedings under the Customs Act, Finance Act, and CGST Act can be quashed due to unreasonable delays in adjudication.
๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐: Petitioners argued that pending proceedings and SCNs dating back as far as 2006 caused undue hardship. The authorities claimed delays were due to non-cooperation from assessees and operational challenges.
โ๏ธ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The #DelhiHighCourt quashed the SCNs and pending adjudication proceedings due to inordinate delays. The court ruled that statutory timelines under Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act, Section 28 of the Customs Act, and Section 73 of the Finance Act must be adhered to unless exceptional circumstances justify delays.
Authorities must provide valid reasons for delays and cannot rely on administrative inertia. ๐ This ruling underscores that authorities must finalize tax adjudications within a reasonable timeframe, ensuring taxpayers are not subjected to indefinite uncertainty due to administrative delays.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own