Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

โ€ขView on Twitter

๐Ÿ“ฐ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ต๐—ถ ๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: Safeguarding Business Expense Deductions โš–๏ธ Injustice Alert: When Tax Officials Overstep! ๐Ÿ” Are Your Business Expense Deductions Safe? A Landmark Ruling You Need to Know!

๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐˜๐—น๐—ฒ: Mehra Jewel Palace (P) Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜: Delhi High Court ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ.: 972/2018 and 15/2021 ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ: 13-Oct-2023

๐Ÿ” ๐—œ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฒ: Mehra Jewel Palace P. Ltd. faced scrutiny when the Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed salary expenses paid to relatives, questioning whether they were excessive under Section 40A(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This provision allows the AO to disallow expenses deemed unreasonable or excessive if paid to specified persons, like relatives or stakeholders, without wholly justifiable business purpose.

๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€: The AO, finding the explanation inadequate, added the salary payments to the companyโ€™s income as excessive. This action brought into question the fair process in evaluating deductions for business expenses.

๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ: The assessee argued that the salaries paid to relatives were justified for the services rendered, asserting that these payments were legitimate business expenses.

๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€: The Delhi High Court observed a lack of evidence concerning the qualifications, experience, and roles of the relatives, which could justify the salary payments. It emphasized that for the AO to disallow expenses under Section 40A(2)(a), there must be a fact-based opinion on whether the expenditures were excessive for the services rendered.

๐—›๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐——: The High Court ruled that the assessee should be granted an opportunity to present further evidence, such as qualifications, work profiles, and responsibilities of the relatives, to validate the payments as reasonable business expenses.

๐Ÿ“œ ๐—œ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€: This decision stresses the importance of an evidence-based and fair approach in assessing business expenses. The court reinforced that the AO should allow the assessee a chance to justify expenses rather than making arbitrary disallowances, upholding natural justice and equity in tax assessments. Team GSTpanacea 7503031378

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own