Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
2 months ago
๐ฐ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ต๐ถ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด: ๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ข๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ช๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น
๐ข The court held, "Repeated deficiency memos cannot be issued without specifics, especially post-appeal decisions granting a refund."
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐: โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ง๐ถ๐๐น๐ฒ: Advance Systems vs The Commissioner of Central Tax Excise and CGST โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ: W.P.(C) 7248/2023 & CM APPL. 28227/2023 โข ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐: Delhi High Court โข ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ: 07-Jul-2023
Issue: Advance Systems, an exporter, sought an Input Tax Credit (ITC) refund for the period January to September 2021 on exports under a Letter of Undertaking (LUT). Initially, the respondent issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) and rejected the claim. On appeal, the appellate authority granted a partial refund. Despite the favorable appellate decision, the GST Department labeled the renewed application as "deficient" and requested additional documents and a fresh application in GST RFD-01.
๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐โ๐ ๐ฆ๐ผ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป: The Delhi High Court found the Departmentโs request unjustified, stating that additional documents were unnecessary, as all were provided initially and affirmed in the appellate process. The court directed the respondent to process the refund as per the appellate order without further deficiencies or demands for previously submitted undertakings and declarations.
โ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐: The court mandated immediate refund processing based on the appellate authorityโs orders, along with applicable interest. It also clarified that once an appellate decision grants a refund, taxpayers should not face redundant administrative hurdles.
๐ This judgment reinforces taxpayer rights against repetitive procedural barriers, particularly where appellate decisions have already confirmed entitlements. It underscores that the Department must avoid arbitrary deficiency notices and process claims efficiently. Team GSTpanacea 7503031378
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own