Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 2 months ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š˜ƒš—²š—暝˜€š—² š—–š—µš—®š—暝—“š—² š—Ÿš—¶š—®š—Æš—¶š—¹š—¶š˜š˜† š—³š—¼š—æ š—§š—¼š˜‚š—æ š—¢š—½š—²š—暝—®š˜š—¼š—暝˜€ šŸ“¢ The Tribunal held: "Charging service tax again on reverse charge from the appellant would result in double taxation. As the appellant and taxi operators are in the same line of business, reverse charge is inapplicable."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Incredible Indian Moments Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Is the appellant liable to pay service tax on a reverse charge basis for taxi services it hired? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: As a tour operator, the appellant hired taxi services and availed CENVAT credit on the service tax paid by taxi operators.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that charging service tax under reverse charge on the appellant, when taxi operators already paid it, would result in double taxation. Since both parties are in the same business, the reverse charge notification is inapplicable. With no evidence of evasion, the demand was set aside. Appeal allowed.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Incredible Indian Moments Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner (Appeals) and Additional Director General, DGGSTI š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 15 September 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes that reverse charge cannot apply where it results in double taxation and the parties are in the same business line.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own