Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 month ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—³š˜‚š—»š—± š—¼š—³ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ The bench of CESTAT observed:

The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a fresh refund claim for service tax because the appellant did not appeal the initial rejection, making it final.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Vedanta Aluminium Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether the rejection of the refund is proper.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The initial refund rejection for 01.03.2009 and 02.03.2009 was not appealed, making it final. The appellant's admission of payments made after 03.03.2009 confirmed the services were not under the previous notification, justifying the fresh claim's rejection.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼: š—£š—®š—暝˜š—¶š—²š˜€: M/s Vedanta Aluminium Limited Vs Commissioner of (Appeals), Central Excise Customs & Service Tax š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 05 June 2024

šŸ“œ The ruling confirms the appellant's fresh refund claim was rightly rejected due to the finality of the initial order and the timing of payments. #CESTAT #ServiceTax #LegalUpdate

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own