Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

about 1 year ago

•View on X

š—–š—²š˜€š˜š—®š˜ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—§š—æš—®š—±š—² š——š—¶š˜€š—°š—¼š˜‚š—»š˜š˜€ š—®š—»š—± š—¦š—²š—æš˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Incentives received by the appellant in the form of a trade discount are not subject to service tax. Appeal allowed."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s Veer Prabhu Marketing Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: The Tribunal ruled that incentives received by the appellant from Tata Motors for meeting sales targets are not subject to service tax, and the penalty for false declaration was not sustained.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that additional incentives received as trade discounts were not subject to service tax. It also found warranty services between 01.04.2012 and 30.06.2012 non-taxable, but taxable post-01.07.2012. The case was remanded for verification, and the appellant was granted immunity under VCES, with the penalty lifted.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Veer Prabhu Marketing Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise – Jodhpur š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 06 February 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that trade discounts and incentives received by dealers to boost sales are not subject to service tax.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own