Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024

@abhishekrajaram

27 days ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—§š—®š˜…š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» š—¼š—³ š—›š—¼š˜€š˜š—²š—¹ š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—²š˜€ š—”š—»š—± š—˜š—±š˜‚š—°š—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—» šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—暝—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Hostel and education services provided by a boarding school are naturally bundled, with education services being the predominant element and falling under the negative list, hence not taxable."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: Mody Education Foundation š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Whether hostel services are taxable as auxiliary education services and if service tax is payable on other services? š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant, a boarding school, charged hostel fees alongside tuition fees. It also received rental income, provided transportation services, and availed goods transport agency (GTA) services.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal ruled that hostel and education services are naturally bundled, with education services providing the essential character. As education services fall under the negative list per Section 66D of the Finance Act, they are not taxable. The appeal was allowed, and no tax was levied on hostel services.

š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: Mody Education Foundation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jodhpur š—¦š—˜š—„š—©š—œš—–š—˜ š—§š—”š—« š—”š—£š—£š—˜š—”š—Ÿ š—”š—¢. 50636 OF 2017 š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 15 May 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling confirms that bundled hostel and education services in a boarding school context are non-taxable as education services dominate the bundle and fall under the negative list.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own