Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

about 19 hours ago

ā€¢View on Twitter

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—¦š—²š—暝˜ƒš—¶š—°š—² š—§š—®š˜… š—¼š—» š—„š—²š—»š˜ š—³š—¼š—æ š——š˜‚š˜š˜† š—™š—暝—²š—² š—¦š—µš—¼š—½š˜€ šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—–š—¼š˜‚š—暝˜ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: Service tax is not leviable on rent and other charges for operating duty free shops at the airport. Limitation period does not apply as tax was collected without authority. Refund allowed.

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—”š—½š—½š—²š—¹š—¹š—®š—»š˜: M/s. Delhi Duty Free Services Pvt. Ltd. š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²: Service tax is not leviable on rent for duty free shops at airports; refund allowed despite the limitation period.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal emphasized judicial discipline, stating the Commissioner must follow previous rulings. It referenced the Supreme Court's decision on adherence to higher authority orders. The Tribunal allowed the appellant's refund for all three periods with applicable interest, reinforcing that tax collected without authority is refundable, irrespective of the limitation period.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—暝—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s. Delhi Duty Free Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Commissioner, Central Tax š—¢š—暝—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 28 February 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling clarifies that service tax is not applicable on rent and charges for operating duty free shops at airports, and reinforces the importance of following higher tribunal orders in administrative proceedings.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on Twitter

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own