Raja Abhishek For NIRC 2024
about 1 month ago
ššš¦š§šš§ š”š²š šš²š¹šµš¶ š„šš¹š¶š»š“ š¼š» š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš²šŗš®š»š± šš®šš²š± š¼š» šš®š¹š®š»š°š² š¦šµš²š²š šš¶š“ššæš²š š¢ š§šµš² š§šæš¶šÆšš»š®š¹ šµš²š¹š±: "Service tax demand cannot be based solely on apparent differences between balance sheet figures and ST-3 returns. Calculation must be transaction-wise and invoice-wise."
š šš®š°šš: šš¼šŗš½š®š»š: M/s. M.P. Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam (Indore) Ltd. ššššš²: Can service tax demand under RCM be raised solely on balance sheet discrepancies? šš°šš¶šš¶šš: The appellant provides services including renting of immovable properties, manpower supply, legal consultancy, and rent-a-cab services.
āļø ššš±š“š²šŗš²š»š: The Tribunal ruled that service tax demands cannot be raised solely on discrepancies between balance sheet figures and returns. Reverse charge mechanism (RCM) demands require transaction-wise and invoice-wise calculations, which were absent. The vague and misdirected show cause notices were invalid, and the appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand.
šš®šš² šš»š³š¼šæšŗš®šš¶š¼š»: š§š¶šš¹š²: M/s. M.P. Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam (Indore) Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax and Central Excise š¦š²šæšš¶š°š² š§š®š šš½š½š²š®š¹ š”š¼. 52190 of 2022 (SM) š¢šæš±š²šæ šš®šš²: 26 May 2023 š This ruling emphasizes the need for precise and specific calculations when issuing service tax demands under RCM.
Page created with TweetHunter
Write your own