Abhishek Raja "Ram"

@abhishekrajaram

12 months ago

•View on X

š—–š—˜š—¦š—§š—”š—§ š—”š—²š˜„ š——š—²š—¹š—µš—¶ š—„š˜‚š—¹š—¶š—»š—“ š—¼š—» š—„š—²š˜ƒš—²š—æš˜€š—² š—–š—µš—®š—æš—“š—² š—®š—»š—± š—£š—²š—»š—®š—¹š˜š˜† š—³š—¼š—æ š—„š—²š—»š˜š—¶š—»š—“ š—¢š—³š—³š—¶š—°š—² š—¦š—½š—®š—°š—² šŸ“¢ š—§š—µš—² š—§š—æš—¶š—Æš˜‚š—»š—®š—¹ š—µš—²š—¹š—±: "Non-payment of tax under RCM for renting office space to a Director is revenue neutral as credit would have been available. Hence, demand and penalties under the extended period are set aside."

šŸ” š—™š—®š—°š˜š˜€: š—–š—¼š—ŗš—½š—®š—»š˜†: M/s Varaha Infra Limited š—œš˜€š˜€š˜‚š—²š˜€: Non-payment under RCM, excess abatement claims, and late returns led to scrutiny; demand partly set aside, penalties reduced. š—”š—°š˜š—¶š˜ƒš—¶š˜š˜†: The appellant provided taxable services and was issued a show-cause notice on 13 July 2020.

āš–ļø š—š˜‚š—±š—“š—²š—ŗš—²š—»š˜: The Tribunal set aside the RCM demand for renting office space as it was revenue neutral, upheld 60% abatement for new construction, reduced late return penalties to ₹6000, and confirmed interest payable under Section 75 for delayed service tax payments.

šŸ“œ š—–š—®š˜€š—² š—œš—»š—³š—¼š—æš—ŗš—®š˜š—¶š—¼š—»: š—§š—¶š˜š—¹š—²: M/s Varaha Infra Limited vs. Commissioner of CGST, Jodhpur š—¢š—æš—±š—²š—æ š——š—®š˜š—²: 16 January 2023 šŸ“œ This ruling emphasizes the principle of revenue neutrality and reasonable penalties under extended periods.

More from @abhishekrajaramReply on X

Page created with TweetHunter

Write your own